Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Template:OpGuide2: Difference between revisions

Template page
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 689: Line 689:


This remains an assumption.
This remains an assumption.
|“The Insurgency’s use of LMGs may be infrequent, but it remains fascinating. We only have a few recovered examples. It appears that these LMGs were originally chambered in an entirely different cartridge (most likely 7.62 x 51 NATO) before being retrofitted to 7.62 x3 9. The reason behind this is likely for the sake of a shared ammo supply with the Insurgency’s rifles. However, that doesn’t explain why they didn’t just adopt a new LMG for the cartridge.
|“The Insurgency’s use of LMGs may be infrequent, but it remains fascinating. We only have a few recovered examples. It appears that these LMGs were originally chambered in an entirely different cartridge (most likely 7.62 x 51 NATO) before being retrofitted to 7.62 x 39. The reason behind this is likely for the sake of a shared ammo supply with the Insurgency’s rifles. However, that doesn’t explain why they didn’t just adopt a new LMG for the cartridge.
The fire rate on these things is impressive. I’m just glad I’ve never had to experience it in action. I could only imagine how terrifying it would be hearing its deep gunshots echo through the Facility.”
The fire rate on these things is impressive. I’m just glad I’ve never had to experience it in action. I could only imagine how terrifying it would be hearing its deep gunshots echo through the Facility.”
|voice = Dr. Hugo York, Small Arms Researcher & Insurgency Tactics Analyst, Area-14
|voice = Dr. Hugo York, Small Arms Researcher & Insurgency Tactics Analyst, Area-14

Revision as of 16:46, 30 March 2023

Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.